ANTI-EVOLUTION part 2

There are 23 models of the origin of the universe, but none completely its not explain-significantly, from where and how it arose.
The most popular model-the big bang theory. According to her, the whole substance was first compressed into a single point, and then exploded and began to grow and form a different body. But if this is true, it is unclear from where come from space, as the Galaxy and all the periodic table?
And what energy this explosion occurred?
"The blast occurred as the claim about 20 billion years ago. But how is this calculated?
It turns out the age of the universe is much smaller. This, as will be discussed below, show the cosmic body.
If indeed the dot exploded, then where did the laws of physics? And besides, matter and energy cannot arise and disappear by themselves-so taught the laws of thermodynamics. Only creationism explains and matter and energy, and laws.
Thus, the observation of cosmic bodies tells us the following:
1. Galaxy mainly take the form of spirals, the angular velocity of rotation of the stars in which the more than closer to her Center. This is why these are spiral curled ends. If the Galaxy would have been for billions of years, they have these swirled all there would be.
2. red stars eventually become white dwarfs. This sufficiently only about 2000 years. Example-star SIRIUS: astronomers of antiquity describe it as red, and now it is white. 100 thousand years have passed, how would it cures that so much time has to pass, and many times less.
3. the rings of Saturn are unstable and disappear, only a few thousand years, not millions.
4. one of the satellites of Jupiter. And if it were millions of years old, it would be cool and would not have a magnetic field, which is molten substance.
5. the Sun burn, and therefore its diameter decreases by 1.5 m per hour, this is the value of very small, because its dimensions are enormous. This value is constant. If the solar system for millions of years, what it used to be? Great, very close to the ground! And in such temperatures the life on the Earth is non-then the Earth only about 6000 years.
6. the Moon is drifting away from the Earth (4 cm per year, and this is also a constant). So, if her age is, as they say, it was from the Earth would initially almost to zero. And that means disastrous ebb and flow throughout the land, on which all the living could drown. In addition, flight to the Moon revealed that the surface layer of dust on it only 1 cm, if the Moon was over, there would be 6 cm per 1 million years or 345 m for 4.5 billion years.
7. leave the comet tails and lose weight. They would have no more than 10 thousand years old, and they all fly. How can this be if millions of years?
So, the age of the universe and the solar system rather than according to the Scriptural theory, which is only a theory, and not the truth.

Evolutionism is not only in space but also on Earth. Here are some examples:
Glaciers are much younger than teach. This can be seen by the speed of their education
(1 2/3 m a year). The so-called "annual rings"-not "summer/winter",
and temperature "heat-cold, which happens many times a day. This under-identify during the second world war, when planted in Greenland there were planes for several years under a huge layer of ice.
Salt in the oceans is the result of rainfall. Now there are 4% salt, nothing more, it accumulates about 5 thousand years.
Who invented the Earth millions of years?
First, that her age is several thousand years old, as the Bible teaches, and millions, said James Hutton in his book "the theory of the Earth" (1795).
This idea developed by Charles Lajel in the book "principles of Geology (1830). He devised geo-chronological eras consisting of periods, and their age. And testimonies, that is, nonetheless, not.
Lajela’s column was never verified. This is just a follower of the clams, as he and his comrades have positioned them. Then and now is a circular reasoning: the age of the fossil is dated for the strata of the Earth, and the layers of date fossil. The era and perids of Lajel, as well as their duration, and the corresponding layers are found in only one place on Earth, namely in the tutorial.
Layers, of course, but they are formed at the same time-while world flood. This is all new and new evidence. Where did they come from? Here's one example: If in a barrel with dirt add water and stir, then also appear again by layers.
Age of rocks sometimes calculated using the radiometric method, for example, c-14 (for relatively young ones), but it is based on three false talking points:
1. initially, the substance was not a carbon isotope, C14
2. the collapse of 14 C occurred at constant speed
3. no external influence
The data points are refuted by experiments. So, these calculations do not trust hypothesis hides.

It is believed that after the creation of the world for different reasons and the plants and animals, and people were larger. This is confirmed by found bones of enormous size. The finds are carefully hidden, because they want people to know just what they are taught.
The explanation is linked to the fact that the Earth was a higher oxygen content and atmospheric pressure. Experiments confirm that in such conditions the plants, for example, it is better to grow and produce a bountiful harvest.
The high percentage of oxygen can lead to the fact that it nourishes not only blood and blood plasma. In such circumstances, a person could, for example, run a tirelessly 100 kilometers.
According to the latest figures, dinosaurs and pangolins (their appearance is an open question) lived for millions of years before man, and along with it. Found them very realistic pictures and sculptures.
Traces of the people and the animals in the same layer are one time, such as found in the United States and elsewhere.

One of the theories for the origin of life on Earth is the "primordial soup" theory of the Russian biologist Oparin. It also assumes that wildlife has emerged from the so-called koacervats - some intermediate stage between inanimate matter and living cells.
In continuation of this teaching was made famous by Stanley Miller's experience to obtain the protein in the laboratory.
Its essence: a more complex substance formed from the most simple: NH3 (ammiac), CH4 (methane) and H2O (water vapor) under the influence of high temperatures and electric shocks. It was alleged that a living cell.
However, there are a number of objections:
1. not those source materials
Connection of these substances could not be sustained.
The original substances. As is well known, ammonia breaks down under the influence of ultraviolet rays, and the consequence of methane, which was supposed to glinozem, actually there.
2. not those conditions
Such connections atmospheric oxygen destroys and, according to Miller, at the time of its synthesis in the atmosphere were not. It is not true, therefore, that a considerable depth found oxide stones, Earth's atmosphere was rich in oxygen.
Electrical discharges, used the experience in reality had to be not only just, but more and more connections and thus destroy built them.
3. not the result
Miller received only a few amino acids, and as left-writhed, which are proteins, and right-writhled - it one is enough to break the connection. In other words, was not living matter and poisonous mixture.
And last objection: while the experience made Miller's mind, which in many ways is not allowed the destruction of the he molecules. Evolution same teaches that everything arose by itself as a result of a confluence of circumstances.
The theory was also launched panspermia living cell is brought to Earth from another world, where all the conditions as in Miller's experience (no oxygen, many meta-and ammonia and high level radiation).
But it runs counter to the theory of probability.
And besides, if so, in what way is the cage was "listed" here?

 

Darwin teaches that all life on Earth arose by chance. His theory was the popular not as a scientific work, but as an ideology (what God does).
He taught that all living things-from the same ancestor. However, prove it and couldn't.
The cell or organism of about 0.01 mm it is very difficult to compartmentalize.
To say that this is a coincidence, both argue that the plane, a Boeing 747 can arise from the Vortex or the hurricane.
No fossils of transitional links not found: from unicellular to multicellular, from fish to frogs etc Archaeopteryx and the Coelacanth is an extinct species of animals, and no intermediaries.
Mutation never form a new form (e.g., eye of the animal without eyes), and lead only to illness, degeneration and death.
One more example:
Fish celikant, which was considered the "fossil", was found alive on the big depth from which it never rises to the surface. Hence this brush-feather  fish no "intermediate" link. Primitive feet and half-light was believed to have celikant finds, no; This fact became the real shock for all evolutionists.

The evolutionary theory of human origins is not tenable.
So, the Australopithecus (skeleton which was found in 1924 by Darth) its skele has, as it turned out, was no different from chimpanzees. This extinct roses monkey. He walked on two legs, that proved the famous paleonotologs Sokerman and Oxford.
Mythical classes "Homo arektus", "Homo èrgaster" and "Homo sapiens" are the various tribes of people. The difference with modern man absenced, the other is that the shape of the skull and its changes, and that today there are different races.
Pildaun’s pers: 35 years he was regarded as an intermediary between monkey and man. Turned out to be fake; the lower jaw of the monkey standing in the human skull (it did h. Darsen) learned the British Museum.
Pitekantrop - fiction. Actually on the island of Java were found the remains of a monkey, and a year later in a 13 ft human bones.
Neanderthal-rich man with a deformed back (perhaps he was suffering from arthritis).
Man from Nebraska: the found tooth was restored whole skeleton! And the tooth was then swine.
Here's how some were "discoveries" in the field of human origins.

 

The theory of the evolution of the universe on all items completely refuted by modern science. It is clear that instead of some "fairy tales" (as they say about creation) we just offer other so-called scientists.
For example, the transformation of one animal to another, and then in person, really similar to the well-known fairy tale about the Princess and the frog, which at night becomes a Princess. Very similar, only they are "happening" over millions of years.
Interesting fact: there is no intermediate links, and those that were supposedly-hoax, and textbooks are taught the same, though it is disproved in the mid-20th century. As a human being and soul, evolutionists explain can not.
The question: "why do you teach that not proven?" the scientists answer: "because we don't have another theory; that is, to teach! " That's why the drive in the head of our children that is horrible. And get rid of these chimeras later is very difficult.