There are 23 models of the origin of the
universe, but none completely its not explain-significantly, from where and how
it arose.
The most popular model - the big bang theory.
According to her, the whole substance was first compressed into a single point,
and then exploded and began to grow and form a different body. But if this is
true, it is unclear from where come from space, as the Galaxy and all the
periodic table?
And what energy this explosion occurred?
"The blast occurred as the claim about
20 billion years ago". But how is this calculated?
It turns out the age of the universe is much
smaller. This, as will be discussed below, show the cosmic body.
If indeed the dot exploded, then where did
the laws of physics? And besides, matter and energy cannot arise and disappear
by themselves - so taught the laws of thermodynamics. Only creationism explains
and matter and energy, and laws.
Thus, the observation of cosmic bodies tells
us the following :
1. Galaxy mainly take the form of spirals,
the angular velocity of rotation of the stars in which the more than closer to
her Center. This is why these are spiral curled ends. If the Galaxy would have
been for billions of years, they have these swirled all there would be.
2. Red stars eventually become white dwarfs.
This sufficiently only about 2000 years. Example - star Sirius: astronomers of antiquity describe it as red,
and now it is white. 100 thousand years have passed, how would it cures that so
much time has to pass, and many times less.
3. The rings of Saturn are unstable and
disappear, only a few thousand years, not millions.
4. One of the satellites of Jupiter. And if
it were millions of years old, it would be cool and would not have a magnetic field,
which is molten substance.
5. The Sun burn, and therefore its diameter
decreases by 1.5 m per hour, this is the value of very small, because its
dimensions are enormous. This value is constant. If the solar system for
millions of years, what it used to be? Great, very close to the ground! And in
such temperatures the life on the Earth is non-then the Earth only about 6000
years.
6. The Moon is drifting away from the Earth
(4 cm per year, and this is also a constant). So, if her age is, as they say,
it was from the Earth would initially almost to zero. And that means disastrous
ebb and flow throughout the land, on which all the living could drown. In
addition, flight to the Moon revealed that the surface layer of dust on it only
1 cm, if the Moon was over, there would be 6 cm per 1 million years or 345 m
for 4.5 billion years.
7. Leave the comet tails and lose weight.
They would have no more than 10 thousand years old, and they all fly. How can
this be if millions of years?
So, the age of the universe and the solar
system rather than according to the Scriptural theory, which is only a theory,
and not the truth.
Evolutionism is not only in space but also on
Earth. Here are some examples :
Glaciers are much younger than teach. This
can be seen by the speed of their education (1 2/3 m a year). The so-called "annual
rings" - not "summer/winter", but temperature "heat-cold", which
happens many times a day. This identified during the second world war, when
planted in Greenland there were planes for several years under a huge layer of
ice.
Salt in the oceans is the result of rainfall.
Now there are 4% salt, nothing more, it accumulates about 5 thousand years.
Who invented the Earth millions of years?
First, that her age is several thousand years
old, as the Bible teaches, and millions, said James Hutton in his book
"The theory of the Earth" (1795 y.).
This idea developed by Charles Lyell in the
book "principles of Geology (1830 y.). He devised geo-chronological eras
consisting of periods, and their age. And testimonies, that is, nonetheless,
not. Lyell’s
column was never verified. This is just a follower of the clams, as he and his
comrades have positioned them. Then and now is a circular reasoning: the age of
the fossil is dated for the strata of the Earth, and the layers of date fossil.
The era and periods of Lyell, as well as their duration, and the corresponding
layers are found in only one place on Earth, namely in the tutorial.
Layers, of course, but they are formed at the
same time - while world
flood (deluge). This is all new and new evidence. Where did they come from? Here's one
example: If in a barrel with dirt add water and stir, then also appear again by
layers.
Age of rocks sometimes calculated using the
radiometric method, for example, C-14 (for relatively young ones), but it is
based on three false talking points :
1. Iinitially, the substance was not a carbon
isotope, C14
2. The collapse of 14 C occurred at constant
speed
3. No external influence
The data points are refuted by experiments.
So, these calculations do not trust hypothesis hides.
It is believed that after the creation of the
world for different reasons and the plants and animals, and people were larger.
This is confirmed by found bones of enormous size. The finds are carefully
hidden, because they want people to know just what they are taught.
The explanation is linked to the fact that
the Earth was a higher oxygen content and atmospheric pressure. Experiments
confirm that in such conditions the plants, for example, it is better to grow
and produce a bountiful harvest.
The high percentage of oxygen can lead to the
fact that it nourishes not only blood and blood plasma. In such circumstances,
a person could, for example, run a tirelessly 100 kilometers.
According to the latest figures, dinosaurs
and pangolins (their appearance is an open question) lived for millions of
years before man, and along with it. Found them very realistic pictures and
sculptures.
Traces of the people and the animals in the
same layer are one time, such as found in the United States and elsewhere.
One of the theories for the origin of life on
Earth is the “primordial soup“ theory of the Russian biologist Oparin. It also
assumes that wildlife has emerged from the so-called “koacervats” - some
intermediate stage between inanimate matter and living cells.
In continuation of this teaching was made
famous by Stanley Miller's experience to obtain the protein in the laboratory.
Its essence : a more complex substance formed from the
most simple: NH3 (ammiac), CH4 (methane) and H2O (water vapor) under the influence
of high temperatures and electric shocks. It was alleged that a living cell.
However, there are a number of objections :
1. Not those source materials
Connection of these substances could not be
sustained.
The original substances. As is well known, ammonia
breaks down under the influence of ultraviolet rays, and the consequence of
methane, which was supposed to “alumina”, actually there.
2. Not those conditions
Such connections atmospheric oxygen destroys
and, according to Miller, at the time of its synthesis in the atmosphere were
not. It is not true, therefore, that a considerable depth found oxide stones,
Earth's atmosphere was rich in oxygen.
Electrical discharges, used the experience in
reality had to be not only just, but more and more connections and thus destroy
built them.
3. Not the result
Miller received only a few amino acids, and
as left-writhed, which are proteins, and right-writhled - it one is enough to
break the connection. In other words, was not living matter and poisonous
mixture.
And last objection: while the experience made
Miller's mind, which in many ways is not allowed the destruction of the he
molecules. Evolution same teaches that everything arose by itself as a result
of a confluence of circumstances.
The theory was also launched “panspermia“
living cell is brought to Earth from another world, where all the conditions as
in Miller's experience (no oxygen, many meta-and ammonia and high level
radiation).
But it runs counter to the theory of
probability.
And besides, if so, in what way is the cage
was “listed“ here?
Darwin teaches that all life on Earth arose by chance. His theory was the popular
not as a scientific work, but as an ideology (what God does).
He taught that all living things - from the
same ancestor. However, prove it and couldn't.
The cell or organism of about 0.01 mm it is
very difficult to compartmentalize.
To say that this is a coincidence, both argue
that the plane, a Boeing-747 can arise from the Vortex or the hurricane.
No fossils of transitional links not found:
from unicellular to multicellular, from fish to frogs etc Archaeopteryx and the
Coelacanth is an extinct species of animals, and no intermediaries.
Mutation never form a new form (e.g., eye of
the animal without eyes), and lead only to illness, degeneration and death.
One more example :
Fish celikant, which was considered the
"fossil", was found alive on the big depth from which it never rises
to the surface. Hence this brush-feather
fish no "intermediate" link. Primitive feet and half-lungs was
believed to have celikant finds, no; This fact became the real shock for all
evolutionists.
The evolutionary theory of human origins is
not tenable.
So, the Australopithecus (skeleton which was
found in 1924 by Darth) its skeleton has, as it turned out, was no different
from chimpanzees. This extinct roses monkey. He DIDN’T walk on two legs, that
proved the famous paleonotologs Sokerman and Oxford.
Mythical classes "Homo arektus",
"Homo ergaster" and "Homo sapiens" are the various tribes
of people. The difference with modern man absenced, the other is that the shape
of the skull and its changes, and that today there are different races.
Pildaun’s pers: 35 years he was regarded as
an intermediary between monkey and man. Turned out to be fake; the lower jaw of
the monkey standing in the human skull (it did C.Darsen) learned the British
Museum.
Pitekantrop
- fiction. Actually on the island of Java were found the remains of a monkey,
and a year later in a 13 ft human bones.
Neanderthal - rich man with a deformed back
(perhaps he was suffering from arthritis).
Man from Nebraska: the found tooth was restored whole
skeleton! And the tooth was then swine.
Here's how some were "discoveries"
in the field of human origins.
The theory of the evolution of the universe,
on all items, completely refuted by modern science. It is clear that instead of
some "fairy tales" (as they say about creation) we just offer other
so-called scientists.
For example, the transformation of one animal
to another, and then in person, really similar to the well - known fairy tale
about the Princess-frog, which at night becomes a Princess. Very similar, only
they are "happening" over millions of years.
Interesting fact: there is no intermediate links, and those
that were supposedly-hoax, and textbooks are taught the same, though it is
disproved in the mid - 20th century. As a human being and soul, evolutionists
explain can not.
The question: "Why do you teach that not
proven?" the scientists answer: "Because we don't have another
theory; that is, to teach!" That's why the drive in the head of our
children that is horrible. And get rid of these chimeras later is very
difficult.
The alternative of evolution is available.
This huge Egyptian pyramid with smooth
surface. The experiment proved that build such behemoths - ancient primitive
tools. These tools also allow you to perfectly grind stones, it is only modern
tool.
The high level of development was
characteristic of the ancient Mayan civilization.
In the ancient texts there are characters,
similar to the aircraft, and not birds. These vehicles (as well as the large
flying animals) could be used in the prehistoric world.
Found also built similar to the pyramid,
under water. With regard to the land of the pyramids, you can assume that the
ancient Egyptians just found them and used at your discretion.
Confirm that all nations have the same
ancestor, and all languages too. The Bible says that Adam and Eve had many
children who originally married each other. From the common ancestor of all
took place according to geneticists.
The theory of creation to the theory of
spontaneous generation.
The biblical picture of the world (round the
Earth, a sign or something).
This is a much more realistic evolution over
millions of years, living from non-living things, or the results of the
"experience" of aliens.
