COSMOLOGY
There are
23 models of the origin of the universe, but none completely its not
explain-significantly, from where and how it arose.
The most
popular model - the big bang theory. According to
her, the whole substance was first compressed into a single point, and then
exploded and began to grow and form a different body. But if this is true, it
is unclear from where come from space, as the Galaxy and all the periodic
table?
And what energy this explosion occurred?
"The blast occurred as the claim about
20 billion years ago. But how is this calculated?
It turns out the age of the universe is much
smaller. This, as will be discussed below, show the cosmic body.
If indeed the dot exploded, then where did
the laws of physics? And besides, matter and energy cannot arise and disappear
by themselves - so taught the laws of thermodynamics. Only creationism explains
and matter and energy, and laws.
Thus, the observation of cosmic bodies tells
us the following:
1. Galaxy mainly take the form of spirals,
the angular velocity of rotation of the stars in which the more than closer to
her Center. This is why these are spiral curled ends. If the Galaxy would have
been for billions of years, they have these swirled all there would be.
2. Red
stars eventually become white dwarfs. This sufficiently only about 2000 years. Example - star Sirius: astronomers of antiquity describe it as red, and now
it is white. 100 thousand years have passed, how would it cures that so much
time has to pass, and many times less.
3. The rings of Saturn are unstable and
disappear, only a few thousand years, not millions.
4. One of the satellites of Jupiter. And if
it were millions of years old, it would be cool and would not have a magnetic
field, which is molten substance.
5. The
Sun burn, and therefore its diameter decreases by 1.5 m per hour, this is the
value of very small, because its dimensions are enormous. This value is
constant. If the solar system for millions of years, what it used to be? Great, very close to the ground! And in such temperatures the life
on the Earth is non-then the Earth only about 6000 years.
6. The
Moon is drifting away from the Earth (4 cm per year, and this is also a
constant). So, if her age is, as they say, it was from the Earth would
initially almost to zero. And that means disastrous ebb and
flow throughout the land, on which all the living could drown. In addition,
flight to the Moon revealed that the surface layer of dust on it only 1 cm, if
the Moon was over, there would be 6 cm per 1 million years or 345 m for 4.5
billion years.
7. Leave the comet tails and lose weight.
They would have no more than 10 thousand years old, and they all fly. How can
this be if millions of years?
So, the
age of the universe and the solar system rather than according to the
Scriptural theory, which is only a theory, and not the truth.
GEOLOGY
Evolutionism is not only in space but also on
Earth. Here are some examples:
Glaciers are much younger than teach. This
can be seen by the speed of their education (1 2/3 m a year). The
so-called
"annual rings" - not "summer/winter", but temperature
"heat-cold", which happens many times a day. This identified during
the second world war, when planted in Greenland there were planes for several
years under a huge layer of ice.
Salt in
the oceans is the result of rainfall. Now there are 4% salt, nothing more, it
accumulates about 5 thousand years.
Who invented the Earth millions of years?
First,
that her age is several thousand years old, as the Bible teaches, and millions,
said James Hutton in his book "The theory of the Earth" ( 1795 y. ).
This idea
developed by Charles Lajel in the book "principles of Geology ( 1830 y. ).
He devised geo-chronological eras consisting of periods, and their
age. And testimonies, that is, nonetheless, not. Lajela’s column was never verified. This is just a follower of the
clams, as he and his comrades have positioned them. Then and now is a circular
reasoning: the age of the fossil is dated for the strata of the Earth, and the
layers of date fossil. The era and periods of Lajel, as well as their duration,
and the corresponding layers are found in only one place on Earth, namely in
the tutorial.
Layers, of course, but they are formed at the
same time - while world
flood (deluge). This is all new and new evidence. Where did they come from?
Here's one example: If in a barrel with dirt add water and stir, then also
appear again by layers.
Age of rocks sometimes calculated using the
radiometric method, for example, c-14 (for relatively young ones), but it is
based on three false talking points:
1. Iinitially, the substance was not a carbon
isotope, C14
2. The collapse of 14 C occurred at constant
speed
3. No external influence
The data points are refuted by experiments.
So, these calculations do not trust hypothesis hides.
PALEONTOLOGY
It is believed that after the creation of the
world for different reasons and the plants and animals, and people were larger.
This is confirmed by found bones of enormous size. The finds are carefully
hidden, because they want people to know just what they are taught.
The
explanation is linked to the fact that the Earth was a higher oxygen content
and atmospheric pressure. Experiments confirm that in such
conditions the plants, for example, it is better to grow and produce a
bountiful harvest.
The high percentage of oxygen can lead to the
fact that it nourishes not only blood and blood plasma. In such circumstances,
a person could, for example, run a tirelessly 100 kilometers.
According to the latest figures, dinosaurs
and pangolins (their appearance is an open question) lived for millions of
years before man, and along with it. Found them very realistic pictures and
sculptures.
Traces of the people and the animals in the
same layer are one time, such as found in the
ORIGIN OF LIFE
One of the theories for the origin of life on
Earth is the "primordial soup" theory of the Russian biologist
Oparin. It also assumes that wildlife has emerged from the so-called
“koacervats” - some intermediate stage between inanimate matter and living
cells.
In continuation of this teaching was made
famous by Stanley Miller's experience to obtain the protein in the laboratory.
Its essence: a more complex substance formed
from the most simple: NH3 (ammiac), CH4 (methane) and H2O (water vapor) under
the influence of high temperatures and electric shocks. It was alleged that a
living cell.
However, there are a number of objections:
1. Not those source materials
Connection of these substances could not be
sustained.
The original substances. As is well known,
ammonia breaks down under the influence of ultraviolet rays, and the
consequence of methane, which was supposed to “glinozem”, actually there.
2. Not those conditions
Such
connections atmospheric oxygen destroys and, according to Miller, at the time
of its synthesis in the atmosphere were not. It is not true, therefore, that a
considerable depth found oxide stones, Earth's atmosphere was rich in oxygen.
Electrical discharges, used the experience in
reality had to be not only just, but more and more connections and thus destroy
built them.
3. Not the result
Miller
received only a few amino acids, and as left-writhed, which are proteins, and
right-writhled - it one is enough to break the connection. In other words, was
not living matter and poisonous mixture.
And last objection: while the experience made
Miller's mind, which in many ways is not allowed the destruction of the he
molecules. Evolution same teaches that everything arose by itself as a result
of a confluence of circumstances.
The
theory was also launched ‘panspermia’ living cell is brought to Earth from
another world, where all the conditions as in Miller's experience (no oxygen,
many meta-and ammonia and high level radiation).
But it runs counter to the theory of
probability.
And besides, if so, in what way is the cage
was "listed" here?
ORIGIN OF SPECIES
He taught that all living things - from the
same ancestor. However, prove it and couldn't.
The cell or organism of about 0.01 mm it is
very difficult to compartmentalize.
To say that this is a coincidence, both argue
that the plane, a Boeing-747 can arise from the Vortex or the hurricane.
No fossils of transitional links not found:
from unicellular to multicellular, from fish to frogs etc Archaeopteryx and the
Coelacanth is an extinct species of animals, and no intermediaries.
Mutation never form a new form (e.g., eye of
the animal without eyes), and lead only to illness, degeneration and death.
One more example:
Fish
celikant, which was considered the "fossil", was found alive on the
big depth from which it never rises to the surface. Hence this
brush-feather fish no
"intermediate" link. Primitive feet and half-lights was believed to
have celikant finds, no; This fact became the real shock for all evolutionists.
MAN
The evolutionary theory of human origins is
not tenable.
So, the
Australopithecus (skeleton which was found in 1924 by Darth) its skeleton has,
as it turned out, was no different from chimpanzees. This extinct roses monkey.
He DIDN’T walk on two legs, that proved
the famous paleonotologs Sokerman and Oxford.
Mythical classes "Homo arektus",
"Homo ergaster" and "Homo sapiens" are the various tribes
of people. The difference with modern man absenced, the other is that the shape
of the skull and its changes, and that today there are different races.
Pildaun’s pers: 35 years he was regarded as
an intermediary between monkey and man. Turned out to be fake; the lower jaw of
the monkey standing in the human skull (it did C.Darsen) learned the British
Museum.
Pitekantrop -
fiction. Actually on the island of Java were found the remains of a
monkey, and a year later in a 13 ft human bones.
Neanderthal - rich man with a deformed back
(perhaps he was suffering from arthritis).
Man from
Here's how some were "discoveries"
in the field of human origins.
WHY ARE WE TAUGHT
The
theory of the evolution of the universe, on all items, completely refuted by
modern science. It is clear that instead of some
"fairy tales" (as they say about creation) we just offer other
so-called scientists.
For example, the transformation of one animal
to another, and then in person, really similar to the well - known fairy tale
about the Princess-frog, which at night becomes a Princess. Very similar, only
they are "happening" over millions of years.
Interesting fact: there is no intermediate links, and those
that were supposedly-hoax, and textbooks are taught the same, though it is
disproved in the mid - 20th century. As a human being and soul, evolutionists
explain can not.
The
question: "why do you teach that not proven?" the scientists answer:
"because we don't have another theory; that is, to teach! " That's
why the drive in the head of our children that is horrible. And get rid of these chimeras later is very difficult.
WHAT IF NOT EVOLUTION
The
alternative of evolution is available.
This huge
Egyptian pyramid with smooth surface. The experiment proved that build such
behemoths - ancient primitive tools. These tools also
allow you to perfectly grind stones, it is only modern tool.
The high level of development was
characteristic of the ancient Mayan civilization.
In the ancient texts there are characters,
similar to the aircraft, and not birds. These vehicles (as well as the large
flying animals) could be used in the prehistoric world.
Found also built similar to the pyramid,
under water. With regard to the land of the pyramids, you can assume that the
ancient Egyptians just found them and used at your discretion.
Confirm
that all nations have the same ancestor, and all languages too. The Bible says that Adam and Eve had many children who originally
married each other. From the common ancestor of all took place according to
geneticists.
The
theory of creation to the theory of spontaneous generation.
The
biblical picture of the world (round the Earth, a sign or something).
This is a much more realistic evolution over millions of years, living from non-living things, or the results of the "experience" of aliens.
