מהספר מעשי השליחים
http://xn----zhcegdajac1aafgbca2b6djgq0je0g.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/%D7%9E%D7%A2%D7%A9%D7%99-%D7%94%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%97%D7%99%D7%9D.pdf
307 קרא פרק מו בעמוד
Народ Ізраїльський до Христа називався «суспільство Господнє» (Повтор 23.3), що було ім'ям Церкви Божої у Старому Завіті: «Буду проповідувати ім'я Твоє братам моїм, посеред ЗІБРАННЯ прославлю тебе» (Пс 22.33). «Серед Церкви заспіваю Тобі» (Євр 2.12). Тут йдеться про місце зборів, синагогу, будинок молитви.
Коли Ізраїль згрішив проти Господа (Книги Царств і Параліпоменон), Він посилав пророків свідчити проти них, щоб привести їх до послуху Закону Божому. Настанови, надіслані Господом через пророків, називається СВІДЧЕННЯМ.
Свідчення ці були звернені до Господнього суспільства, тобто до Церкви.
Коли Ізраїль нарешті відмовився приймати свідчення і наполегливо продовжував порушувати Закон, Господь позбавив їх духу пророцтва. «І запитав Саул Господа; але Господь не відповів йому...» (1 Сам 28.6).
Коли ж Ізраїль каявся від щирого серця і підкорявся Закону, дух пророцтва оживав знову, як це сталося з апостолами.
Настанови в посланнях Нового Завіту також є свідченням через дух пророцтва.
First
Deputy Chief Bishop - Member of the Expert Council of the State Duma Committee
on Public Associations and Religious Organizations, Bishop Konstantin Bendas
explains the provisions of the Federal Law "On Amendments to the Federal
Law" On Countering Terrorism "and certain legislative acts of the
Russian Federation regarding the establishment of additional measures
countering terrorism and ensuring public safety" (No. 374-F3 dated July 6,
2016):
"New
amendments to the Federal Law" On Freedom of Conscience and Religious
Associations "for the first time introduced such a concept as "missionary activity".
Missionary
activity is the public activity of a religious association aimed at outside
non-church people with the aim of involving them in the activities of a
religious association.
The law
does not in any way prohibit missionary activity, but imposes certain new
requirements on missionaries by calling.
So, in accordance
with the letter of the law, he "does not encroach" in any way
"on personal evangelism and, in accordance with the Federal Law" On
Freedom of Conscience "and the Constitution of the Russian Federation, I
can" still freely share and spread my religious views. " But the law
regulates religious activities aimed at involving people in a religious
organization or group on behalf of the organization. In this case, the preacher
must have some kind of document and be ready to present it.
What could
it be?
1. An
official document of a religious organization confirming that he is its leader.
2. A
document certifying that he is a clergyman.
3. It can
be a document certifying that you are a member of some collegial body of the
church: church council, pastor council, elders council, council of elders, or
something else that defines our charter or internal definitions.
4. It can
be a direct document authorizing to engage in missionary activities on behalf
of a religious organization.
In the case
of a religious group, only one document is possible, confirming the authority
to engage in missionary activities on behalf of a religious group, issued, so
to speak, by some council of this religious group".
* * *
What is this law in fact?
This is a restriction on freedom of speech
and freedom of conscience (everything that is against the government and the ROC
- Russian Orthodox Church is "terrorism").
MISSIONARY - is the propaganda of your faith
or involvement in your faith. This means that youth and medical missionary
activities can be banned.
It is believed that only a religious
association can preach, and not an individual person.
Nothing is allowed except preaching your own
creed. For example, electives of Christian morality and ethics, and generally
theological discussion in general, are prohibited if the listeners do not
belong to this faith.
The preacher must have a document that he
(at least one):
- community
leader
- clergyman
- member of
the community council
-
authorized by the organization, if the private
Do NOT preach or invite others in your
meetinghouses, only in rented premises. The company must have a permit.
Preaching at home is also regulated.
Also
online preaching is restricted and permission is required.
It is considered missionary to invite at a
certain time to a certain place. The article is vague, so you can ban a group
or meeting at home.
The law, apparently, does not apply to the ROC - Russian Orthodox Church (there are church services inside, and the sermons of priests, and all the rituals, etc., and different people come there, including unbaptized and atheists). And the priests also teach the lessons of the Law of God in schools.
There
are separate norms for missionary work for foreigners and for the distribution
of literature.
So, all this is needed by the ROC so that they do not teach and preach differently from them!
В первый день создал Бог свет
-
Вечной ночи больше нет!
Во второй день облака
Подняла Его рука.
В третий день создал Бог
сушу,
И деревья, и цветы,
Сливки, яблоки и груши
Превосходной красоты.
Также воды Он собрал
И морями их назвал.
В день четвёртый в небесах
Солнце засияло,
На земле в его лучах
Всем теплее стало!
Вечером взошла луна,
Всем нам нравится она!
Звёзды засияли
В тёмно-синей дали!
В пятый день по небу
Птички полетели,
А в речной, морской водичке
Рыбки заблестели.
Крабы, раки и лягушки,
И красивые ракушки.
Всё, что в небе и в воде,
Сотворил Бог в пятый день.
А на следующий день
Появился вдруг олень,
Слон большой и мышка-крошка,
Заяц, ослик, мышка, кошка…
Всех зверей земли большой
Сотворил Бог в день шестой.
И, как всем делам венец,
Сотворил он, наконец,
Человека. Имя Сам
Дал Господь ему: Адам.
А потом Он создал Еву,
Просто чудо-королеву,
И Адаму подарил.
Ох, и счастлив же он был!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Дух пророцтва припиниться лише тоді, коли настане досконале (1 Кор 13.10).
До Христа були не тільки пророки, а й пророчиці: Девора (Суд 4.4), Олдама (4 Цар 22.14) та ін.
Окрім 12 апостолів та Павла, пророками у християнській церкві були: Агав (Дії 11.27-28); Варнава, Симон, Луцій, Манаїл (Дії 13.1); Юда та Сила (Дії 15.32). У Новому Завіті згадуються також: пророчиця Анна (Лука 2.36-38) та чотири доньки Пилипа (Дії 21.8-9).
Останніми днями буде рясно вилити Святого Духа (Духа пророцтва) на Божий народ:
«І в останні дні, каже Бог, виливаю від Духа мого на всяке тіло, і будуть пророкувати сини ваші та дочки ваші; і юнаки ваші будуть бачити видіння, і старці ваші сновидінням будуть зрозумілі. І на рабів Моїх і на рабинь Моїх у ті дні виллю від духа Мого, і будуть пророкувати» (Дії 2. 17-18).
Про дух пророцтва (його матимуть очікуючі Другого пришестя, тобто Адвентисти Сьомого Дня):
«БОГУ ПОКЛОНИСЬ, БО СВІДЧЕННЯ ІСУСОВО Є ДУХ ПРОРОЦТВА» (Об'явл 19.10).
Цей дух буде ТІЛЬКИ В ІСТИНІЙ ЦЕРКВІ (АСД), яка дотримується заповідей Божих і віри в Ісуса (Об'явл 12.17 і 14.12).
LOT - in Hebrew "goral", in Greek
"clairons" - the means described in the Bible, with the help of which
God declares his will and reveals secrets.
Examples:
Numbers 34.13 and Joshua 14.2 - Division of
the land between the tribes according to their numbers.
Josh 7.16-18 - Finding out why the
Israelites were defeated at Gai (it was Achan).
1 Samuel 10.20-21 - Saul is chosen as the
first king of Israel.
Jonah 1.7 - Determination on the ship going
to Tarshish, who is the culprit of the storm - the prophet Jonah.
Acts 1.21-26 - The selection of the twelfth
apostle to replace Judas from two candidates.
There is no doubt that the lot reveals the
will of God, and this is also said in the parables of Solomon: “A lot is thrown
in the floor, but its entire decision is from the Lord” (Prov 16:33). Lots were
also used in the ritual on the Day of Judgment (Lev 16.5-10).
The result of the lot is not something
random, the result of which God does not determine or reacts passively. The lot
is that, the outcome of which is not subject to people, but completely subject
to God.
God's decision may depend on people's
stereotypes. So, the choice of Saul for the kingdom is due to the fact that the
people considered high growth, athletic build and external beauty to be the
main virtues of the king. This turned out to be a mistake, and the next king,
David, was anointed to the kingdom in his youth and did not possess the above
qualities, but he possessed completely different ones: modesty, nobility, courage,
a bright mind, and most importantly, strong faith.
* * *
The question arises: what about lotteries
and other gambling games?
The answer is as follows:
The purpose of roulette with a metal ball,
dice, machines - "one-armed bandits" and the like is completely
different. This is an attempt to acquire money in an easy way, instead of
getting it as a result of labor. For most people, this leads to the loss of
what is, namely ruin, but even those who won large sums of money, this money
does not make them happy. In general, these phenomena from the world of sin are
outside of God's framework, therefore, Satan rules in this world of accidents.
The same can be said about other things
outside of God's framework, that is, His words and commandments (mysticism and
occultism, astrology and witchcraft, etc.).
* * *
Finally, I must say that there are more
reliable means than drawing lots.
The first and accessible to all now is the
Bible itself. It contains God's commandments - the Decalogue - which should be
the main principles of our life unchanged, including the fourth commandment
about the Sabbath day. But, in addition, there are hundreds and thousands of
more specific recommendations for different life situations.
The second was not always given to the
people of Israel and the church. This is the gift of prophecy. The first
Christians cast lots before Pentecost, and after the descent of the Holy
Spirit, the need for the lot disappeared and it was abolished (Acts
5.3,11.15-18,13.2,16.6-9).
In the last days, this gift will also manifest itself.
Кто, злом владея, зла не причинит,
Не пользуясь всей мощью этой власти,
Кто двигает других, но, как гранит,
Неколебим и не подвержен страсти,
Тому дарует небо благодать,
Земля дары приносит дорогие,
Ему дано величьем обладать,
А чтить величье призваны другие.
Хибні пророки рухаються духом брехні, що походить від диявола (Іоанн 8.44). Вони мають видіння і стверджують, що ці видіння від Господа.
Вірні ознаки лжепророків:
- їх передбачення НЕ ВИКОНУЮТЬСЯ;
- вони «дають знамення і творять чудеса» (Матв 24.24), щоб обдурити людей і тим змусити їх
повірити їм, що вони мають владу відкидати Закон Божий та порушувати його;
- вони стверджують, що можна грішити, і вчать так людей;
- вони вчать, що люди не зобов'язані дотримуватися суботи. «Не вказують різницю між чистим і
нечистим і від субот Моїх вони заплющили очі свої, і Я принижений у них» (Єз 22.26).
- вони перешкоджають Євангелії Христа. «Є люди, які слухають вас і бажають спотворити
Євангелію Христову» (Гал 1.7).
- вони заперечують Божественність Христа.
«Всякий дух, який не сповідує Ісуса Христа, що прийшов у тілі, не є від Бога, але це дух
АНТИХРИСТА, про який ви чули, що він прийде тепер є вже у світі» (1 Іван 4.3).
- ПЛОДИ ЇХ - ЗЛО.
«І тоді скажу їм: Я ніколи не знав вас; відійдіть від Мене, що роблять беззаконня» (Матв 7.23).
БЕРЕЖІТЬСЯ ЛЖЕПРОРОКІВ !!! (вiрш 15)
Taniah or
Likutei Amarim - the fundamental book on Hasidism, is considered the main
creation of the Old Rebbe, Rabbi Shneur-Zalman (1746-1813; 5505-5573 in Hebrew
chronology) - the founder of the Hasidic doctrine of Chabad.
The book
consists of several treatises, the first of which is called "The Book of
Mediums" (that is, people occupying the middle level between the righteous
and the wicked), followed by: "The Gate of Unity and Faith",
"The Message of Repentance", "The Holy Message" and
"Final Treatise".
The
Lubavitcher Rebbe Menachem Mendel Schneerson calls Taniah "The Written
Torah of Hasidism."
The
previous Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Yosef Yitzhak Schneerson, established the
custom of daily studying the lesson of Taniah. The Lubavitcher Rebbe Menachem Mendel
Schneerson refers this lesson to one of the "three lessons that are the
same for every soul," and in many of his letters calls for observing these
lessons (daily Torah, Tegilim, and Taniah)
Taniah's
philosophy
Taniah, as
its author points out, is written for the "seekers" and the
"confused". Such foundations of faith as the Existence of God,
creatio ex nihilo, Revelation, are accepted by the author as given. Others,
such as the attributes of the Divine, Providence, Unity, Messianism, etc., are
considered by him as constituent parts of his ethical system and are
illuminated by the light of Kabbalah.
The main
purpose of Taniah's book is to become a practical guide, charting a new path of
Divine ministry in which the various parts of the book are to be "guides."
Rabbi
Shneur Zalman (believes that the average individual is endowed with moral
strength, if only he makes the necessary effort to suppress and control these
discordant forces, even if he does not know how to eradicate them completely.
Therefore, he is confident that the harmony of the individual can be achieved,
in any case, in the entire sphere of real and practical moral life. The author
of Taniah writes that the souls of non-Jews have a different origin from the
souls of Jews. In the modern civilized world, such expressions cause rejection
and justified indignation.
TANIAH IS
NOT FROM GOD !!!
The main drawback of Britain, Hasidism and Judaism - are too complex and fog CLARIFICATION IN CONTRAST TO BIBLICAL simplicity LINKS TO Kabbalah, which is Hell, propaganda of exclusivity of the Jewish nation and hatred of non-Jews, and most importantly - rejection of Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah-Christ!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Дух Святой - два коротких
слова.
Сколько силы в себе таят!
Дух Святой - Бог сошёл на
землю
Нас учить, утешать, прощать.
Сколько мира и благодати
В нашей жизни приносишь Ты!
Наш хранитель! Наш благ
даятель!
Дух Святой, как нам нужен Ты!
Обличенья Твои, советы,
Так нужны нам в земном пути.
Только силой Твоей согретые
Мы способны, Господь, расти.
Дух Святой, нет тебя
надежней,
Нет сильнее, мудрей, верней.
Часто, жаль, оценить не
можем,
Что имеем в любви Твоей.
Сколько силы и утешенья
В трудный час посылаешь Ты,
И в пустыне суровой, дикой,
Я с Тобою могу идти.
Если враг тупики воздвигнет,
Не боюсь я - со мною Ты.
Сколько сладости, упованья,
Ты даришь мне в земном пути.
Сладость-жизнь всю Тебе
доверить,
Покориться Тебе во всём,
На Тебя Одного надеяться,
Не тревожиться ни о чём.
Эту сладость не променяю
Снова я на земной покой.
Дух Святой - Ты моя отрада,
Мой защитник и мой покой!
Моё сердце Тобой наполни
До краёв, без остатка, всё,
Чтобы святости плод духовный
Завершил спасенье моё!
מהספר מעשי השליחים
http://xn----zhcegdajac1aafgbca2b6djgq0je0g.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/%D7%9E%D7%A2%D7%A9%D7%99-%D7%94%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%97%D7%99%D7%9D.pdf
283 קרא פרק מג בעמוד
Справжній пророк у видінні має відкриті очі, не дихає і не усвідомлює, що твориться навколо нього в земному житті.
Він надихається Святим Духом.
Він навчає вірувати в Христа та Його Євангеліє.
Він наставляє каяттю у гріхах і покірності Закону.
Він учить дотримуватися суботи Господньої:
«Якщо ти утримаєш ногу твою заради суботи від виконання забаганок твоїх у святий день Мій, і будеш називати суботу відрадою, СВЯТИМ ДНЕМ ГОСПОДНІМ, вшановуваним, і вшануєш її тим, що не будеш займатися звичайними твоїми справами, догоджувати твоїм забаганкам та марнословити, то будеш мати радість у Господі, і Я зведу тебе на висоти землі і дам скуштувати тобі спадщину Якова, батька твого: уста Господні промовили це» (Іс 58.13-14).
Його вчення буде узгоджене з ВСІМИ попередніми пророками і Божими справами.
ПО ПЛОДАХ ЇХ ДІЗНАЄТЕ ЇХ (Матв 7.20).
The synthetic theory of evolution (also modern evolutionary synthesis) is a new
evolutionary theory, which is said to be "a synthesis of various
disciplines, primarily genetics and Darwinism, also based on paleontology,
taxonomy, molecular biology, and others."
It is
believed that the evolutionary act took place when "selection retained a
gene combination, atypical for the previous history of the species." As a
result, for the implementation of evolution, it is allegedly necessary to have
three processes:
1.
mutational, generating new variants of genes with low phenotypic expression;
2.
recombination, creating new phenotypes of individuals;
3.
breeding, determining the correspondence of these phenotypes to the given
habitat or growth conditions.
THEORY
APPEARED WHEN IT HAS DISCOVERED THAT ARE MANY PROBLEMS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN
DARWIN'S TEACHING. AND AS A CONSEQUENCE, THE DECODING OF THE GENOME AND OTHER
NEWEST DISCOVERIES OF THE END OF THE TWENTY-FIRST AND TWENTY-FIRST CENTURIES
DEFINED IT ALL.
All supporters of the synthetic theory recognize
the participation of the three listed factors in the evolution.
An
important prerequisite for the emergence of a new theory of evolution was the
book by the English geneticist, mathematician and biochemist JBS Haldane, Jr.,
who published it in 1932 under the title The Causes of Evolution. Haldane,
creating the genetics of individual development, immediately included the new
science in solving the problems of macroevolution.
Basic
provisions of STE
In the
1930s and 1940s, a "synthesis of genetics and Darwinism" took place
quickly. Genetic ideas have penetrated into taxonomy, paleontology, embryology,
biogeography. The term "modern" or "evolutionary synthesis"
comes from the title of the book by J. Huxley "Evolution: The Modern
synthesis" (1942). The expression "synthetic theory of
evolution" in its exact application to this theory was first used by J.
Simpson in 1949.
The authors
of the synthetic theory disagreed on a number of fundamental problems and
worked in different areas of biology, but they were almost unanimous in their
interpretation of the following basic provisions:
• the local
population is considered an elementary unit of evolution;
• material
for evolution is mutational and recombination variability;
• natural
selection is considered as the main reason for the development of adaptations,
speciation and the origin of supraspecific taxa;
• gene
drift and the principle of the founder are the reasons for the formation of
neutral traits;
• a species
is a system of populations reproductively isolated from populations of other
species, and each species is ecologically isolated;
•
speciation consists in the emergence of genetic isolating mechanisms and is
carried out mainly in conditions of geographic isolation.
Thus,
"the synthetic theory of evolution can be characterized as a theory of
organic evolution by natural selection of genetically determined traits."
The
postulate of the population as the smallest evolving unit remains valid.
However, a huge number of organisms without a sexual process remains outside
the scope of this definition of a population, and this seems to be a
significant incompleteness of the synthetic theory of evolution.
Natural
selection is not the only driver of evolution.
Evolution
is not always divergent in nature.
Evolution
is not necessarily gradual. It is not excluded that in some cases individual
macroevolutionary events may also have a sudden character.
Macroevolution
can go both through microevolution and its own ways.
Aware of
the insufficiency of the reproductive criterion of the species, biologists
still cannot offer a universal definition of the species both for forms with a
sexual process and for agamic forms.
The random
nature of mutational variability does not contradict the possibility of the
existence of a certain canalization of evolutionary pathways that arises as a
result of the past history of the species. The theory of nomogenesis or
evolution based on regularities, put forward in 1922-1923, should also become
widely known. L.S. Berg. His daughter RL Berg considered the problem of
randomness and regularity in evolution and came to the conclusion that
“evolution takes place along permitted paths” (RL Berg, “Genetics and
Evolution”, Selected Works, Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1993, pp. .283).
Along with
monophilia, the widespread occurrence of paraphilia is recognized.
A certain
degree of predictability, the possibility of predicting the general directions
of evolution (the provisions of the latest biology are taken from: Nikolai
Nikolaevich Vorontsov, 1999, pp. 322 and 392-393) is also a reality.
We can confidently say that the development of STE will continue with the emergence of new discoveries in the field of evolution.
Criticism
of the synthetic theory of evolution
The
synthetic theory of evolution "is not in doubt among the majority of
biologists (so-called theorists)": it is believed that the process of
evolution as a whole is satisfactorily explained by this theory.
As one of
the criticized general provisions of the synthetic theory of evolution, one can
cite its approach to explaining secondary similarity, that is, close
morphological and functional characters that were not inherited, but arose
independently in phylogenetically distant branches of the evolution of
organisms.
According
to neo-Darwinism, all the characteristics of living things are completely
determined by the genotype and the nature of selection. Therefore, parallelism
(secondary similarity of related creatures) is explained by the fact that
organisms have inherited a large number of identical genes from their recent
ancestor, and the origin of convergent traits is entirely attributed to
selection. At the same time, it is well known that similarity traits that
develop in sufficiently distant lineages are often maladaptive and therefore
cannot be plausibly explained either by natural selection or by common
inheritance. The independent emergence of identical genes and their
combinations is deliberately excluded, since mutations and recombination are
random processes.
In response
to such criticism, supporters of the synthetic theory may object that the ideas
of S.S.Chetverikov and R. Fisher about the complete randomness of mutations
have now been significantly revised. Mutations are random only in relation to
the environment, but not to the existing organization of the genome. Now it
seems quite natural that different parts of DNA have different resistances;
accordingly, some mutations will occur more often, others less often. In
addition, the set of nucleotides is very limited. Consequently, there is a possibility
of an independent (and, moreover, completely random, unreasonable) appearance
of identical mutations (up to the synthesis by species far from each other of
the same and similar proteins that could not get them from a common ancestor).
These and other factors determine a significant secondary repeatability in the
structure of DNA and may explain the origin of non-adaptive similarity from the
standpoint of neo-Darwinism as a random choice from a limited number of
possibilities.
Another
example - criticism of STE by supporters of mutational evolution - is
associated with the concept of punctualism or "intermittent balance".
Punctualism is based on a simple paleontological observation: the duration of
stasis is several orders of magnitude longer than the duration of the
transition from one phenotypic state to another. Based on the available data,
this rule is generally valid for the entire fossil history of multicellular
animals and has a sufficient amount of evidence.
The authors
of punctualism oppose their view to gradualism - Darwin's view of gradual
evolution through small changes - and consider intermittent equilibrium to be
sufficient reason to reject the entire synthetic theory. This radical approach
has sparked a 30-year debate around the concept of intermittent equilibrium.
Most authors agree that there is only a quantitative difference between the
concepts of “gradual” and “discontinuous”: a long-term process appears as an
instantaneous event, being depicted on a compressed timeline. Therefore, punctualism
and gradualism should be considered as complementary concepts. In addition,
supporters of the synthetic theory rightly note that intermittent equilibrium
does not create additional difficulties for them: prolonged stasis can be
explained by the action of stabilizing selection (under the influence of
stable, relatively unchanging conditions of existence), and rapid change - by
S. Wright's theory of shifting equilibrium for small populations , with sharp
changes in the conditions of existence and / or in the case of the passage of a
species or any of its isolated part, population, through the bottleneck.
And
finally, the ardent opponents of all such evolutionary theories are CREATIONIST
SCIENTISTS, that is, supporters of the creation of the world by the Creator,
and it is not by accident that there are too many arguments in favor of
rejecting Darwin's and the likelihood of a similar hypothesis. But most
biologists stubbornly continue to "believe" in evolution.
Julian Huxley's calculations:
Mutations are different: for one true one,
thousands of unbelievers.
Mutations happen to all creatures, such as
flies, but they continue to be flies. No one has ever seen the opposite happen.
Serious mutations are harmful and even lead
to the death of the animal.
“Artificial selection seems to refute rather than support evolution” (On Call, July 3, 1972, pp. 8-9).
There is
one useful mutation per 1000 (experiment with fruit flies). 1 mutation - 1
breed. To get 2 useful mutations, we need to breed 10002 breeds, 3
useful mutations - 10003 breeds, n useful mutations - 1000n
breeds (since we should get the next mutation only in a breed where ALL
previous mutations were useful).
In order for the transition to a more highly
developed organism to occur, a million such beneficial mutations are needed,
and the number of breeds - 10001.000.000 - a number with three
million zeros. This is incomparably more than elementary particles in the
Metagalaxy.
Thus, EVOLUTIONISM IS COMPLETELY REFUSED,
AND CREATIONISM IS CONFIRMED.
OTHER
ARGUMENTS AGAINST: Although the new non-Darwinian theory is accepted by many
scientists, it cannot be considered correct, because:
1.
Geochronological ages of rocks and fossils, estimated by incorrect formulas,
are still incorrect, not proven and are calculated using circular reasoning.
2.
Incorrect assessment of the found remains, not to mention the fossils found in
the layers mentioned above, for example, giant finds that are hidden from
ordinary visitors to museums.
3.
Inanimate and especially living nature is not taken into account as an
undoubted product of the mind, for example, the complex structure of a living
cell.
4. Even if
we assume that God controlled evolution, this is not confirmed, since
intermediate links between the types of animals have not been found.
5. Man is
not like any animal and surpasses any of them. The found "remains of
ancient people" as a result of the discovery of the genome were recognized
as belonging to animals.
It is a VERY Pity that the so-called scientists do not deal with other bottlenecks of this "new" theory at all, they keep silent about the problems and sacrifice them to fantasies.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Расскажи мне об Иисусе, мама,
Правда, Он евреем тоже был,
Как и я, в субботу утром рано
В синагогу с братьями ходил?
В Назарете, городе еврейском,
Жил и умер, мама, за меня,
Так же, как наш дедушка под
Брестом?
Мама, с кем тогда велась
война?
Мама гладит голову сыночку,
Отмолчаться рада бы, но нет.
Сын подрос, пора поставить
точку,
Честный и правдивый дать
ответ.
За тебя Он умер, Избавитель,
Чтобы жизнь твоя была светла,
Как Герой погиб и как
Спаситель
В битве на войне добра и зла!
На войне не делают уступок.
Помни это и всегда, в пути,
Каждый шаг свой, каждый свой
поступок
Ты Ему, Иисусу, посвяти.
Алла Виленская
Після гріхопадіння Бог не спілкувався з людьми особисто, як Він це робив в Едемі (Іс 59.2).
Іноді Він передавав людям свою волю через ангелів.
А також через пророків. «Бо Господь нічого не робить, не відкривши Своєї таємниці рабам Своїм, пророкам» (Ам 3.7).
Такі одкровення даються у баченні:
«Якщо буває у вас пророк Господній, то Я відкриваюся йому у видінні, уві сні говорю з ним» (Чис 12.6).
Одкровення від Бога дається через Духа Святого.
Фізичний стан пророків у момент бачення:
1. Вони не дихають (затримка дихання), але можуть говорити і очі у них відкриті.
«Я припав обличчям моїм до землі і онімів. Але ось хтось, на вигляд схожий на
синів людських, торкнувся уст моїх, і я відкрив уста мої, почав говорити та
сказав тому, що переді мною, що стояв: Пане мій! Від цього бачення нутрощі
мої обернулися в мені і не стало в мені сили. І як може говорити раб
такого мого пана з таким моїм паном? Бо в мені нема сили, і
дихання замерзло в мені» (Дан 10.15-17).
2. Вони перебувають свідомістю на небесах і тому не усвідомлюють, що відбувається
навколо і не бачать того, що навколо них: «Знаю людину у Христі, яка
тому тому чотирнадцять років (чи в тілі - не знаю, чи поза тілом - не знаю: Бог
знає) був захоплений до третього неба» (2 Кор 12.2).
3. Окрім пророка, бачення не бачить ніхто. «І тільки один я, Даниїле, бачив це
бачення, а колишні зі мною люди не бачили цього бачення, але сильний страх
напав на них і вони втекли, щоб сховатися» (Дан 10.7).
The seal of God is a symbol of what
indicates a person who keeps all God's commandments and follows Christ, in
contrast to those who have the seal of the beast, those who follow tradition
and stereotypes, although they think that they serve God, but in fact are prey
of satan. It is this seal that is placed in the seventh chapter of Revelation.
However, the convert to Christianity does
not immediately receive this seal, the fullness of the Holy Spirit. This is a
long and long-term process. Before the seal of God, the believer is first given
the seal of the Holy Spirit, and this is not the same thing.
On the day of baptism, more precisely
before baptism with water at the time of the baptism of the Holy Spirit - a
covenant with God - the conversion of a person is sealed in the heart by the
Holy Spirit (Ephes 1.13-14, 4.30; 2 Cor 1.22). It (the Holy Spirit or the seal
of the Holy Spirit) is called a pledge, that is, something that must be worked
out or returned with a profit; if then in the heart there is no place for the
spirit of God, the person loses it. As a person studies the Bible and works on
himself together with God, for the sake of his own promised happiness he gets
rid of sins, big and small, overcoming trials (baptism by fire), shows people from
the world a personal example and preaches the Gospel, finally comes, into a
state of perfection and complete submission to the Lord and ceases to sin
(violate the commandments) altogether. He does not become a robot, he remains
himself, that is, a person, but without all those character traits and actions
that can destroy him. This is how he receives a sign - the seal of God. He who
received this seal is saved forever.
Of course, this is very difficult. The Bible
teaches us that there is not a single person on earth who does not sin (Rom
3:10, 23). Sometimes it takes years to eradicate sin alone. After all, it is
not only the one who does not kill who sins, but he breaks this commandment
when he offends someone or destroys his health with bad habits. But if a person
has a desire to correct himself, then, despite the fact that everyone sins,
because the descendants of Adam, they will still receive full righteousness
posthumously and, having been resurrected, will live in a new world. Remember
the thief from the cross (Luke 23.42-43).
It is quite another matter those who are
from the last generation and will meet Christ alive. Even during their
lifetime, the door of grace in the heavenly sanctuary will close, and the high
priest of Christ will no longer be there. And when Christ returns to earth,
these people should already be pure and blameless (Rev 4.5, Ezek 9.4),
eradicated all sins, and the very last - the sin of the tongue, as stated in
the third chapter of the Epistle of James. They achieved this thanks to a
zealous desire and efforts, as well as taking an example from Christ, who never
sinned, and there is nothing of the devil, that is, sin, in Him! (John 14.30)
Only those who have the seal of God can receive the "latter rain" -
the fullness of the Holy Spirit, similar to the day of Pentecost, to complete
the preaching of the Gospel on earth to all people without exception.
It is also important to know that in order
to receive God's seal, one must keep not five or nine, but all ten commandments
(James 2.10-11). The most important is the Sabbath commandment and the fact
that to celebrate THIS DAY, according to the Scriptures, and not the tradition
or innovations of the clergy. Whoever celebrates not this day of the week, but
some other, no matter whether it is Sunday or Friday or no day, God cannot
consider his own! Such a person knows God's will, but deliberately violates it.
The Sabbath celebration, by the way, is the
seal of God. Of course, the main thing in it is the pure character of Christ,
but the fact is that the seal always consists of three components:
Name - "Lord"
Title - "Creator"
Territory - "heaven and earth"
THEY ARE CONTAINED EXACTLY THE COMMANDMENT ABOUT SATURDAY. This is the only commandment that Adam and Eve still observed (Gen 2.2-3), and in which only in one God is called the Creator, and the Sabbath is a reminder of creation: “For in six days the Lord created the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that in them, and rested on the seventh day; therefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day and sanctified it ”(Ex 20.11).
Радуйся, радуйся, мой
дорогой,
Вытри все слёзы и следуй за
Мной!
В последнем рывке совершал ты
подъём,
А враг искушал: «Не дойдём,
не пройдём…»
Но ты не стонал, а Меня
прославлял,
И рядом стоящих всегда
вдохновлял.
Ты знал в своём сердце, что Я
не предам,
Что Я твою жизнь никому не
отдам.
Ты верил и ждал, и теперь
пройден путь,
Но ты, что прошёл, никогда не
забудь:
Твой опыт поможет другим
побеждать,
Он их вдохновит и верить, и
ждать.
Твой труд не напрасен, он был
предо Мной,
И Я в твоей жизни буду стеной.
Стеною защиты, стеною огня,
И кто же рискнёт всё же
тронуть тебя?
Ведь Я не шутил, когда всё
обещал,
Я верил, и ждал, и ошибки
прощал,
Я выдвинул цель и поставил
тебя,
И сердце испытывал, нежно
любя.
Я Царство готовил, и жить в
нём учил,
А глупым казалось - ты лямку
влачил.
Но время подходит итоги
считать,
Моё воздаяние всем воздавать.
Не бойся ухмылок и сплетен
людей,
Ведь плоть не подскажет
хороших идей.
Ведь плоть - это тормоз, ведь
плоть вводит в грех,
Когда ты с ней дружишь, то
гибнет успех.
Победа, сынок, не приходит
шутя,
Её не достигнешь, вслед ветра
свистя.
И я не надеюсь на силу людей,
Мне Дух помогает всегда и
везде.
И вера твоя - это Мой Святой
Дух,
Который разносит преграды
вокруг.
Не бойся и верь: все заторы в
пути
Тебе помогу Я успешно пройти!